Brackish Water
Pretreatment
Develop and
demonstrate a low-cost, energy efficient, simple and reliable system for
use in brackish water pretreatment for electrodialysis reversal (EDR)
and reverse osmosis (RO).
The
option for inland desalinization for the supply of fresh water is
becoming increasingly important in regions where there are not enough
natural water resources available. This issue is specifically
critical in arid and semi-arid areas where the natural water resources
are not sufficient to meet the population growth, economic development
and agricultural needs. Electrodialysis reversal
and reverse osmosis systems show potential; however, pretreatment of
brackish water would greatly enhance the ability of these systems to
remove
particulates and troublesome inorganic foulants.
Develop and
demonstrate a low-cost, energy efficient, simple and reliable system for
use in brackish water pretreatment for electrodialysis reversal (EDR)
and reverse osmosis (RO). The proposed solution would remove
particulates, aluminum, manganese, and iron to specified levels using
commercially available, cross over
or new innovative technologies but must
be applicable for use at the Tularosa Basin desalination facility
located at Alamogordo NM. The solution must respect the specified EDR
and RO feed water requirements.
Your proposed solution should:
-
Meet state and
federal regulations;
-
Be reasonably easy to
use and reliable;
-
Be applicable to
rural systems;
-
Be affordable,
maintainable, and cost effective;
-
Provide optimum
performance, viable yield, and minimum reject water;
-
Be energy efficient;
-
Address disposal of
concentrates and provide a viable disposal pathway; and
-
Be adaptable to different size systems.
Each
team is advised to read the Participation Guide for a comprehensive
understanding of the contest evaluation criteria.
Upon your registration, WERC will
provide you with a copy of the Public Involvement Plan and Participation
Guide. Additionally,
your proposed design will be evaluated on issues identified in the
problem statement as well as others listed below.
-
Ease of use;
-
Affordability;
-
Yield and viability;
-
Reliability;
-
Energy and water use efficiency;
-
Cost effective operation;
-
Disposal cost and handling;
-
Long term performance and system management;
-
Cost and quality of the water produced per liter;
-
Functionality and operability throughout the year; and
-
Concentrate, reject water management and waste generation.
During the contest, WERC will provide you with up to five gallons of a
sample consistent with typical brackish water containing various amounts
of particulates, salts, etc. The specific amount required for your
process to operate during the bench scale must be communicated to WERC
at least three weeks prior to the contest. Appropriate Material
Safety Data Sheets should be available during the bench scale
demonstration. The
initial (there may be more samples taken in the near future - check this
page at least once a month until January 2009
for updates on the water chemistry) water quality follows:
|
Analyte |
Well 2,
ppm |
Treat
Target,
EDR |
Treat Target,
RO |
|
B |
0.0 |
|
0.05 |
|
Ba, Total |
0.01 |
|
|
|
Ca, Total, as Ca |
500 |
|
|
|
Al, total |
0.4 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Cu, Total |
0.058 |
|
|
|
Fe, dissolved |
|
0.3 |
0.1 |
|
Fe, Total |
0.50 |
|
|
|
Mn, dissolved |
|
0.1 |
0.05 |
|
Mn, total |
0.3 |
|
|
|
Hardness, Total as CaCO3
|
2649 |
|
|
|
K |
2.3 |
|
|
|
Magnesium |
340 |
|
|
|
Na |
780 |
|
|
|
SiO2, reactive |
22 |
|
|
|
SiO2, Total |
|
|
|
|
Sr, Total |
9.5 |
|
|
|
Chloride |
530 |
|
|
|
Sulfate |
3000 |
|
|
|
Nitrite |
|
|
|
|
Nitrate |
8.8 |
|
|
|
Fluoride |
|
|
|
|
Total inorganic PO4 |
|
|
|
|
P/M Alkalinity, as CaCO3
|
1250 |
|
|
|
Total dissolved solids |
5500 |
|
|
|
TOC |
|
|
|
|
pH |
7.2 |
|
|
The written report is the best means to demonstrate
your team’s insight into the problem. The report should discuss other
technologies considered but not pursued and why and to give the reader
full understanding of the magnitude of your team’s involvement with the
problem details. The report will be evaluated for clarity, logic
and coherence. Standards appropriate for publications in technical
journals apply.
In
addition to the listed requirements, the following must be discussed in
your report to WERC management:
-
Describe process steps in detail including cost/benefit, evaluation
criteria, and screening protocol;
-
Discuss advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of the selected
method;
-
Include recent references and sources of information;
-
Address any safety issues or considerations associated with the
process;
-
Discuss the time-line for system construction until full operation;
-
Present a sensitivity analysis regarding the selected process;
-
Discuss total life-cycle costs
costs for both EDR and RO cases; and
-
Waste generation, concentrate management, and handling.
Contact:
Barbara Valdez,
Program Facilitator
(575) 646-7821
(800) 523-5996
|